Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mathias Bourgue vs Daniel Windahl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bourgue vs Windahl analysis and find out who is favored!
Mathias Bourgue vs Daniel Windahl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bourgue 1 - 0 Windahl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bourgue has won 49.78% of points on their second serve, while Windahl has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bourgue, in recent form, has won 46.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Windahl has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.2% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bourgue has saved 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Windahl has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bourgue has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 36/ 32), with Windahl winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bourgue has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 258/ 170), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Windahl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 19/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Bourgue has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.24% of matches (W/L 32/ 27), where as Windahl has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bourgue winning 1 times and Windahl being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bourgue winning 2 and Windahl winning 0. The last match between Bourgue and Windahl was at the Croatia F13, 09-06-2014, Second, Clay with Mathias Bourgue getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bourgue and Windahl have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bourgue winning 0 times and Windahl 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bourgue winning 0, and Windahl 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bourgue has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.32 while Windahl has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bourgue has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Windahl has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bourgue has converted 39.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Windahl has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
293
Rank
140
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
825
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
59% (452-308)
Career Total W/L
59% (62-43)
42% (11-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$143,480
Career Prize Money
$1,425
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mathias Bourgue | Daniel Windahl |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mathias Bourgue | Daniel Windahl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (11/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (28/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (293/294) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 129 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 214.42 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1181/1850) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (812/1181) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (333/669) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (59/150) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (644/1748) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (11/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 26% (19/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Mathias Bourgue Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mathias Bourgue
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Radu Albot
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
106)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
105
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Mae Malige
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Mathias Bourgue
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Mathias Bourgue
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Mathias Bourgue
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonio Caruso
Player
Mathias Bourgue
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
37
Total Points Won
40
|
4-6 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Mathias Bourgue
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Mathias Bourgue
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Windahl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Monteban
Player
Daniel Windahl
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Daniel Windahl
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
77%
(
80 of
104)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Windahl
Player
Piotr Zbroja
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julien Cagnina
Player
Daniel Windahl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Dubarenco
Player
Daniel Windahl
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Daniel Windahl
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 |
Stats
Konstantin Kravchuk
Player
Daniel Windahl
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Daniel Windahl
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Daniel Windahl
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bourgue Vs Windahl Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
